Radiation caused cancer
It's unclear if radiation-induced cancer is linked to 5G. However, there is evidence to suggest that it may reduce the immune system, which makes us more susceptible to COVID-19. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that 5G doesn't affect the transmission of coronaviruses that are new. However, more research is necessary to confirm these results.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is evaluating the health risks associated with 5G technology. The WHO is looking at public health data and scientific evidence to identify the potential health risks associated with the technology. It's not certain if the risks are severe enough to warrant a moratorium on 5G deployment.
Immune system weakening
One of the most recent conspiracy theories circulating the internet claims that the use of 5G technology weakens the human immune system. Based on this belief, the 5G technology could be responsible for the spread of the Covid-19 virus, which is a fatal coronavirus. The virus can be transmitted from person-to-person and was first recognized by Wuhan, China, about 18 months ago. Covid-19 is found in a variety of nations and is associated with thousands of deaths.
5G wireless technology uses Radio waves with high frequency to link smartphones and other devices. There is a lack of research regarding whether or not the radio waves will cause cancer. Some experts believe that 5G can weaken the immune system and could lead to an increase in the chance of developing COVID-19.
Cancer
A recent resolution from The Portland City Council demands that the Federal Communications Commission do more studies on the health consequences of 5G wireless networks. While this research is needed however, it's unlikely to be completed in the same timeframe as 5G technology is rolled out. The industry will be moving onto the next technology, presumably 7G or 6G. https://writeablog.net/fishtop28/various-ways-to-use-protection-clothing-with-5g-shielding expresses an interest in local control over this issue, but the resolution also acknowledges that local governments are not legally permitted to defy federal directives.
Many experts claim that the radiation produced by 5G wireless technology is not enough to cause cancer. However, recent research conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has questioned this notion. The study was able to eliminate the causal connection that radiofrequency frequencies cause cancer both in human and animal studies. In the study, researchers looked over 125 research studies that were conducted on humans and 75 animal models from 2008 until the year 2019. The FDA discovered no link with radiofrequency radiation and the development of cancer.
Vandalism
A rising quantity of thieves are attacking the infrastructure of 5G networks. Some vandalism has involved sabotaging the mobile networks through burning down masts and destroying other infrastructure. Additionally, there have reported instances of individuals concealing needles and razor blades in anti-5G posters. In addition, several sabotage attempts have been associated with COVID-19. COVID-19 pandemic.
Protests against 5G are taking place throughout the globe. Anti-5G activists have designated June 6 as the day of worldwide protest and declared that the radio emissions from 5G can be harmful to the environment. But the majority of scientists agree with these activists.
Arson
There have been many rumors that link 5G mobile networks with arson attacks. The most recent incident involved the burning of twenty towers of cell phones in the United Kingdom during the Easter weekend. The arsonists had a pattern in mind that they lit fire to cell phone towers with the form of bunny ears. This could be related with the pandemic of coronavirus. However, no one has been able to prove this theory.
Although emf radiation shield have been in circulation for a long time, the recent excitement about 5G has brought them to the forefront. For example, a New York Times article noted that Russian propaganda network RT America had been broadcasting reports about threats to 5G. Meanwhile, groups like Oakmore Neighborhood Advocacy Group Oakmore Neighborhood Advocacy Group have been using Pall's arguments at city council meetings and community forums, and vocally opposing 5G deployment in their region.
Politicians
The next generation of wireless technology, 5G is sweeping the country. It promises better connections and more speedy Internet and greater access to information. However, with the widespread introduction, it could also create the potential for problems. For example, 5G might interfere with the airplane's instruments. Already, airlines have changed some flights to avoid proximity to new cell towers.
This is why a lot of politicians are worried regarding the security that 5G technology will bring. The United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been tasked with quelling concerns about the new technology. However, some politicians have called for the FCC to protect passengers and aviation by ensuring that 5G is built in a safe manner. Reps. Andy Kim, Thomas Suozzi, as well as Peter Defazio have written to the FCC requesting more information on the infrastructure required for 5G.
Environmental activists
A growing number of people are worried about the possible dangers of 5G mobile networks. Celebrities, environmental activists as well as fringe researchers have spoken out about the issue. In 2015 around 190 scientists from 40 countries wrote a letter to the UN asking for the World Health Organization to review current guidelines regarding 5G network. In April, the European Union echoed those concerns in April 2019 when it stopped work on the network.
The protests to stop 5G technologies are taking place all over the world. In Australia there was"We Say No to 5G" (2020a) campaign in Australia "We Say No to 5G" (2020a) campaign coordinated protests across the nation. Others have joined in the cause. The most recent protest was held in Mullumbimby, Australia, in late April. Residents there were motivated to protest because 5G installers set up the new network against the will that the council of town. Though this was legal in the eyes of law, town council had no authority to approve of the project.
